PolyHistorical vs PolyOrderbooks

PolyHistorical vs PolyOrderbooks

Both services record Polymarket order books; neither is a total replacement for the other. PolyHistorical focuses narrowly on BTC, ETH, and SOL Up/Down markets at a 300ms spec with paid plans from $17. PolyOrderbooks carries the wider crypto and sports archive at 250ms. This page compares them on the facts, not the slogans.

Figures measured as of 2026-10-03 on the published PolyOrderbooks archive.

Scope

What each records

  • PolyHistorical — BTC Up/Down at 5m, 15m, 1h, 4h, 24h; ETH and SOL at 5m, 15m, 1h. 13,000+ resolved markets; archive kept after resolution.
  • PolyHistorical Pro adds historical Binance BTC/USDT spot and USD-M futures depth for cross-market analysis.
  • PolyOrderbooks — the full crypto Up/Down archive (5m, 15m, 4h anchors plus thresholds and event-linked) and 700k+ sports markets across 226 series, with prices and metrics in the same archive.
  • PolyOrderbooks keeps resolved markets queryable as well; coverage stretches back years before either service's newer competitors began recording.

Resolution

Capture and query fidelity

PolyHistorical documents 300ms L2 snapshots and sub-50ms responses on its public site, oriented to execution-aware replay of BTC/ETH/SOL markets. It is a strong spec for that lane.

PolyOrderbooks captures and serves at 250ms on every plan, including free Starter; measured server-side history reads (~1ms), with end-to-end <50ms on well-connected networks, and does not rely on a competitor's rolling window: paid access reaches 30–120 days of history for crypto and 30 days for sports, with resolved markets remaining queryable.

Both are fine enough to see the settlement-minute moves a 1-minute grid hides. If you work BTC-only, PolyHistorical is competitive; if your research spans other assets, sports, or metrics in the same rows, PolyOrderbooks carries them.

Pricing

Tiers, from their public pages

  • PolyHistorical Starter — free, no card; limited to recent BTC markets by count (last 50 five-minute and fifteen-minute, last 24 hourly and four-hour, last 5 twenty-four-hour), 60 req/min, 1,000 req/day.
  • PolyHistorical Pro — $17/month; 31 days of covered BTC/ETH/SOL markets, Binance depth, Strategy Replay, 300 req/min.
  • PolyHistorical AI — $29/month; Pro data plus ~100 AI strategy backtests.
  • PolyHistorical Suite — $37/month; 60-day history plus the AI backtests.
  • PolyOrderbooks Pro — $19/month at the time of writing; 250ms L2, prices, and metrics with a full multi-day window, resolved markets queryable (catalog 1.31M markets, 2.987B book snapshots).
  • Both offer enterprise contact for the long archive; PolyOrderbooks also ships S3 delivery on enterprise.

Honest split

When PolyHistorical is the right call

If your strategy universe is BTC Up/Down only (with ETH and SOL secondary) and you want the narrowest, cheapest execution-aware depth feed with an integrated Strategy Replay, PolyHistorical's Pro tier is a credible, cheaper lane than broader platforms.

If you need the wider archive — altcoins, sports, metrics, thresholds — or a 12-month-plus history window for research that competes with published settlement studies, that is PolyOrderbooks' lane. The honest product advice: price alone is covered by the free official API; depth below 1 minute is a recorded-archive problem either way.

Worked example

The same job through both lenses

Take one concrete job: stress-test a BTC Up/Down strategy against the settlement minute. PolyHistorical&#39;s 300ms BTC depth with Binance spot and USD-M futures crossing is precisely built for this lane, and its $17 lane for BTC-only work is a strong value. The 250ms PolyOrderbooks grid serves the same BTC minute too, alongside ETH, SOL, and the rest of the crypto family in the same query.

Now widen to a research question that crosses assets: compare final-minute behavior across crypto and a sports event, or rerun a published settlement study that counts resolved contracts across an eighth-month window (298 in the BTC corpus alone). That is not a BTC-only lane; the wider archive covers it in one place, while the narrower product would need per-asset accounts.

Both products keep resolved markets queryable, so neither loses your study when the market settles. The real signature is the window: thousands of contracts over many months versus the last few weeks of paid browsing, and the free tier that reaches multi-year coverage only on the wider archive.

Decision

How to pick

Choose PolyHistorical when the universe is BTC Up/Down first, ETH and SOL second, and the integrated Strategy Replay is your daily tool. Choose PolyOrderbooks when altcoins, sports, thresholds, or a years-spanning history window enter the question.

The honest tiebreaker is the free tier: start on the PolyOrderbooks Starter for one replay, narrate the settlement-minute behavior, and then check whether the narrow $17 product is actually your workflow. Most multi-asset work stays on the wider archive; the narrow lane is a real but smaller population.

FAQ

Is PolyHistorical affiliated with Polymarket?

No. Its own site states it is an independent data provider, not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Polymarket or any exchange. The same holds for PolyOrderbooks.

Which covers more Polymarket markets?

PolyHistorical covers BTC, ETH, and SOL Up/Down (13,000+ resolved markets, per its site). PolyOrderbooks records the crypto Up/Down archive plus 700k+ sports markets across 226 series.

Who has the finer capture spec?

PolyHistorical documents 300ms snapshots; PolyOrderbooks captures and serves at 250ms on every plan. Both are sub-minute; the deciding factors are coverage breadth and history depth, not 50ms of spec sheet.